Thursday, May 15th, 2008

Sexy science - but not sexy enough?

Scientific American has just run a piece on the biology of orgasm - which is cool.

However...
On page 3 of this piece, the following study is quoted:

' To find out whether orgasm looks similar in the female brain, Holstege’s team asked the male partners of 12 women to stimulate their partner’s clitoris—the site whose excitation most easily leads to orgasm—until she climaxed, again inside a PET scanner. Not surprisingly, the team reported in 2006, clitoral stimulation by itself led to activation in areas of the brain involved in receiving and perceiving sensory signals from that part of the body and in describing a body sensation—for instance, labeling it “sexual.”

But when a woman reached orgasm, something unexpected happened: much of her brain went silent. Some of the most muted neurons sat in the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex, which may govern self-control over basic desires such as sex. Decreased activity there, the researchers suggest, might correspond to a release of tension and inhibition. The scientists also saw a dip in excitation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, which has an apparent role in moral reasoning and social judgment—a change that may be tied to a suspension of judgment and reflection.

Brain activity fell in the amygdala, too, suggesting a depression of vigilance similar to that seen in men, who generally showed far less deactivation in their brain during orgasm than their female counterparts did. “Fear and anxiety need to be avoided at all costs if a woman wishes to have an orgasm; we knew that, but now we can see it happening in the depths of the brain,” Holstege says. He went so far as to declare at the 2005 meeting of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Development: “At the moment of orgasm, women do not have any emotional feelings.” '

(Emphasis mine.)

I have to say my admittedly anecdotal experience contradicts both these points. Drastically.

Again I am reminded of my wish to see a study of sexual expression run with medical fetishists - so that the whole getting-off-inside-a-MRI-machine part enhances rather than taints the study.
But then again, try finding someone who fits the bill who doesn't have piercings!
(1 comment | Leave a comment)

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

UK 'extreme' porn ban passed

Mother's porn law campaign ends

(Background to the campaign here.)

The woman who forced this on us, who has already said that she doesn't even believe violent sexual images had anything to do with her daughter's murder and that she was pursuing this ban for 'closure', added this charming thought:
"Sometimes the freedoms of like-minded, decent people have to be curtailed because of a few others."

Thanks for that. Now people who have committed no crime other than making images of legal consensual sexual activities are criminals, facing up to three years prison.
(Leave a comment)

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Today's dodgy spam concept is...

...referring to a well-known story to promote your product, without grasping how that story ended, viz:

"Grow your men's treasure like a Jack's Bean Tree!".

Remember what Jack did to the beanstalk? Not an association one wants with Viagra, I suspect.
(Leave a comment)

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

Tentacle-on-tentacle action

Via Boing, today's best lede:

"In the violent tangle that is sex between giant squids, almost anything can happen, including accidentally injecting yourself with firehose-pressure blasts of sperm."

http://www.cdnn.info/news/eco/e050925.html
(3 comments | Leave a comment)

Thursday, December 6th, 2007

So much for that fantasy...

Zero-G sex - only four positions work and missionary is 'impossible'.
(Leave a comment)

Sunday, November 4th, 2007

America has broken sex

That bitter old cynic Warren Ellis, in today's 'Sunday Hangover' on Suicide Girls (so, for all sorts of reasons, Not Safe For Work, m'kay?) on the scary disconnect in modern US porn. He starts with defining the "Hot Carl" and goes on to share the worst of the breed.

Now I'm a fairly open-minded guy. By many definitions, one might even say I'm quite pro-kink.
But...

"...the more of these things you see or read of, the more you realise that American porn now has no relationship to sex. Seriously, when was the last time you laid out sheeting for your girlfriend to throw up over in between blowing you? When was the last time you punched your girlfriend in the back of the head while you were coming in her?

Yes, here we are at the Donkey Punch: smashing your girlfriend in the brains so that she involuntarily tightens and spasms around you while you're dribbling your grey, poisoned little load up into her anal cavity."

I am actually squicked now. This is not easy.
(Leave a comment)

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

Two great tastes in one Sandwich

Reality Sandwich has interviews with the sublime Alex Grey and a discussion of 'Newage' non-Monogamy.
(Leave a comment)

Friday, July 20th, 2007

Best blog title today

The Goddess mere mortals call Susie Bright put this gem up today... a little bit of evil internet editing called,

Harry Potter and the Black Leather Cunt

No - no spoilers for HP7. Not remotely safe for work or children.
(Leave a comment)

Saturday, July 7th, 2007

Susie Bright doesn't want to feel safe

Interesting piece by the Sex Goddess herself, started when she was asked to appear on a conference panel about "making online spaces safer".

' My first reaction was like a child being asked to put on my seat belt for the 100th time: Ugh. "But I don't want to be safe online, Mom!"

When I think of all my ambitions for my blog or my writing, I think of being influential, incendiary, funny, poignant— never "safe."

My work has too often been criticized for "making [someone] feel unsafe," as if my editorial line was an assault.

I've been on the receiving end of firebomb and assassination threats, all because someone claimed that if I spoke aloud in public, "women would not be safe." The irony of the Molotov cocktail!

I remember sitting in a police station, answering puzzled questions from officers about why I was being targeted, and admitting, "I have no idea why someone wants to kill me for promoting women's sexual self-interest." The cops shook their heads. It just didn't seem to rise to Martin Luther King standards.

How did this "safe shit" get so crazy?

The "safe" rhetoric does not come out of a emergency response manual. It doesn't have anything to do with living in a war zone, or leading a secret double life.

This kind of "safe" is a euphemism for something much more sticky. "Safe" is a code phrase that originates in the feminist movement of the 70s, where theorists like Robin Morgan postulated that "porn is the theory, rape is the practice."

Catchy, isn't it?—€” But it fails to hold water (or rape statistics).

After Morgan's witticism, a coterie of activists began referring to porn as a variety of killing instructions. ...And what exactly WAS this "porn," so glibly offered up as evidence? You guessed it: anything that made you feel "not-safe."

One could scrutinize all manner of American advertising and popular culture, even the most G-rated, to a withering feminist analysis. Throw in the Bible while you're at it. But denouncing garden-variety sexism never got press like Carrie-Nation-style porn protesters.

Pretty soon, certain organizations of the feminist left were ground to a halt, because at any moment, someone could pipe up in a meeting: "I feel unsafe when you say that, Mary!"

There was nowhere to turn. Debate had no recourse in the "safe zone," and the "victim" won, smugly, by suppressive default. '

I'm not sure I agree with her entirely - creating safe spaces for people in emotionally vulnerable states is an important thing, even online (the attention paid to avoiding possible mental trigger-words on [info]dark_christian is a good example. But on the other hand, you end up so easily with the mentality PJ O'Rourke so well named "Safety Nazis".

Read the whole thing - at least, you'll never quite see NSFW in the same light...
(Leave a comment)